Case studies: real numbers from our own accounts, including the weak ones
These are our own experiments, not customer stories. Every video was AI-generated and labelled as such. Every number has the date it was read and the research file it came from, and most of the numbers are small. We publish them because they show what a run costs and what happens after you post.
Want the prompts instead? See the prompt library and the use cases.
The case studies
Dumpling Does Nothing: a five-episode AI pet comedy, and what it really cost
A capybara who tries to do nothing. Seven paid renders for five episodes, and almost no audience.
Outcome: Production worked and cost was predictable. Distribution did not: single and double digit views on most platforms.
Run 2026-10-23, numbers read up to 2026-10-28
The Last Subscriber: an AI founder-drama series, from 112 views to almost none
A first-person drama with a recurring heroine. One short test burst of views, then a flat line.
Outcome: Episode 1 got a single test burst of views. Later episodes got single or double digits. It was not a proven format.
Run 2026-10-23, numbers read up to 2026-10-28
Pip Has One Job: three stickman episodes for 40 credits each
The cheapest run we did: still-image stickman episodes. Early reads only, and mostly small.
Outcome: Cheap and fast to make. Reads are only hours old and small, except one Facebook reel. No verdict yet.
Run 2026-10-27, numbers read up to 2026-10-28
The cat-fact Short that got 111 views: what that number does and does not mean
A plain explainer video. 111 views is our best YouTube result for that channel, and it is still a test burst.
Outcome: Best of its channel, still small: roughly one test batch of views, most viewers left in seconds.
Run 2026-10-25, numbers read up to 2026-10-28
What 24,000 Shorts taught us about virality: no formula we could trust (our study)
We measured 24,273 Shorts. The honest result: no title or hook rule was robust, and structure does not predict outliers.
Outcome: No structural rule survived our own checks. The strongest hint is small, and it is a hint.
Run 2026-10-28, numbers read up to 2026-10-28
In progress: the 12-video formula experiment
We are testing a short checklist from the study below on our own accounts, as paired videos: one made with the checklist, one in our current default style, posted on the same day. Results come after the 72-hour reads. No numbers are published yet, and nothing from it will be written up as a promise of views.
How to read these pages
- Each number has an "as of" date. YouTube, Facebook and Instagram numbers change for days after posting.
- Our own views and comment visits are not subtracted unless a page says so. Treat small numbers as signal, not proof.
- Credits are what the product charged. USD figures from our provider costs are measurements, not invoices.
- Prices and what a prompt costs: what things cost.
Resources
Connect and build
Case studies with real numbers
- Dumpling Does Nothing: a pet comedy case study
- The Last Subscriber: an AI drama case study
- Pip Has One Job: a stickman series case study
- StoryShort cats video: 111 views, honestly
- 24,000 Shorts and virality: our study
- 48% Make One AI Video and Stop: What 2,224 Videos Show
- 8,689 Views in Two Weeks: One Real Channel, All the Numbers